Introduction

Over the past several years, the US-China trade war has evolved from a policy dispute into a significant economic force with global implications. What started in 2018 as a modest tariff increase has now escalated into a full-blown trade conflict that continues to shape markets, influence business strategy, and impact everyday consumers. In this article, we’ll take a closer look at the historical progression of tariffs, explore how the trade war is affecting global markets and supply chains, and consider what it means for investors and consumers alike. As recent developments unfold under the second Trump administration, understanding the broader economic context is more important than ever.

Historical Context and Tariff Data

The US-China trade war began in 2018 under the Trump administration. Initially, the tariffs were modest, but they increased dramatically over time. Here are some key statistics and historical data: 

• January 2018: Average US tariffs on Chinese exports were around 3.1%.
• February 2020: Average US tariffs on Chinese exports increased to 19.3%, covering 66.6% of US imports from China, roughly $335 billion of trade.  
• April 2025: Average US tariffs on Chinese exports now stand at 124.1%, more than 40 times higher than before the trade war began.
  

The second Trump administration has significantly increased tariffs through various actions:

• February 4 and March 4, 2025: 10 percentage point increases on all imports from China.
• March 12, 2025: Tariffs on imports of steel, aluminum, and derivative products.
• April 3, 2025: Tariffs on imports of automobiles. 
• April 5, 9, and 10, 2025: Additional tariffs on imports from China, with increases of 10, 74,  and 41 percentage points, respectively.  

Impact on Global Markets 

The trade war has led to increased volatility in global markets. The imposition of tariffs has disrupted supply chains, increased costs for businesses, and led to shifts in trade dynamics. For instance, the global dairy market is experiencing shifts, with the European Union and the United Kingdom potentially stepping in to fill the gap left by reduced US-China trade. 

Additionally, the energy sector is facing challenges. China’s energy transition and climate policy are being impacted by the trade tensions, potentially leading to increased greenhouse gas emissions and hindering progress on global climate goals.  

Impact on Consumers and Investors

Pros

1. Diversification of Markets: Chinese exporters are seeking new markets to offset the impact of US tariffs, which could lead to a more diversified global trade landscape.
2. Innovation and Adaptation: Companies are being forced to innovate and adapt to new market conditions, potentially leading to technological advancements and improved efficiency. 

Cons

1. Increased Costs: Higher tariffs lead to increased costs for businesses and consumers,  resulting in higher prices and reduced purchasing power.  
2. Economic Slowdown: The uncertainty and increased costs associated with the trade war are leading to a slowdown in global economic growth. The US economy, for example, has lost momentum in Q1 of 2025 and into Q2.  
3. Disruption of Supply Chains: The imposition of tariffs has disrupted global supply chains,  leading to delays and increased costs for businesses.  

Professional Analyst Opinions

Analysts from Zacks Investment Research have highlighted several key points regarding the trade  war’s impact on global markets:  

• Market Volatility: The trade war has led to increased volatility in global equity markets, with widespread weakness observed. 
• Inflation Concerns: Higher tariffs are expected to lead to sharply higher inflation,  undermining consumer purchasing power and confidence.  
• Investment Uncertainty: Businesses are adopting a “wait-and-see” approach to international trade, which risks stalling fixed investment spending and could lead to job losses.  

Expert Quotes & Opinions

The use of tariffs in the US-China trade war can indeed be seen as a negotiation tactic. By imposing high tariffs, the United States aims to pressure China into making concessions on various trade issues, including intellectual property rights, market access, and trade imbalances. This approach is intended to bring China to the negotiating table with the goal of reaching a more favorable trade agreement for the United States.  

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has commented on the impact of the trade war, stating, “The tariffs are likely to contribute to higher inflation and could slow economic growth. We are closely monitoring the situation and will adjust our policies as needed to support the economy.” This indicates that while the tariffs are a tool for negotiation, they also have significant economic implications that need to be managed carefully.  

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has also emphasized the need for de-escalation in trade  tensions, saying, “No one thinks the current status quo is sustainable.” This suggests that there is an understanding within the administration that the high tariffs are not a long-term solution but rather a means to achieve specific trade objectives.  

President Trump has acknowledged the elevated level of tariffs, stating, “145% is very high, and it won’t be that high, it’ll come down substantially. But it will not be zero.” This further supports the idea that the tariffs are part of a strategic negotiation process, with the expectation that they will be reduced once certain trade goals are met.  

Overall, the use of tariffs in the US-China trade war is a complex strategy aimed at achieving specific trade outcomes, but it comes with significant economic risks and challenges that need to be carefully managed.

Conclusion

The US-China trade war is far from over—and while it may serve strategic purposes in shaping trade policy and negotiations, it comes with substantial economic costs. From rising prices to disrupted supply chains and heightened market volatility, the effects are being felt globally. While there are some silver linings, such as market diversification and innovation, the broader impact leans toward increased uncertainty. For investors and businesses alike, staying informed and flexible is key. As we await the next chapter in this ongoing trade saga, one thing is clear: policy decisions made at the negotiation table can—and do—ripple through the markets and into our daily financial lives.

Securities offered through Cambridge Investment Research, Inc., a Broker/Dealer, Member FINRA/SIPC. Investment Advisory Services offered through Cambridge Investment  Research Advisors, Inc., a Registered Investment Advisor, offering services in AZ, CT, FL, MA, MI, NC, NY, SC, TX, UT, and VT. Licensed Insurance Professional. ARE-7435 | 20027 –  2020/4/23 *Cambridge and Command Wealth Management are not affiliated. 

 We are an independent financial services firm helping individuals create retirement strategies using a variety of investment and insurance products to custom suit their needs and objectives. This material has been prepared for informational and educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide, and should not be relied upon for accounting, legal, tax or investment advice. Investing involves risk, including the loss of principal. No Investment strategy can guarantee a profit or protect against loss in a period of declining values. Any references to protection benefits or lifetime income refer to fixed insurance products, never securities or investment products. Insurance and annuity products are backed by the financial strength and claims-paying ability of the issuing insurance company.